ART: For 'Gratitude' by steals_thyme
May. 5th, 2009 10:38 amTwo pieces drawn for
steals_thyme for their fic 'Gratitude' which is all kinds of freaking awesome and is located here: Click on me DO IT NOW
ART NUMBER ONE what is done with prismacolor markers and pencils, old skool style.
ART NUMBER TWO what is all-graphite and is gonna stay that way. D:
Trying to suck less. Hopefully succeeding at that at least.
ART NUMBER ONE what is done with prismacolor markers and pencils, old skool style.
ART NUMBER TWO what is all-graphite and is gonna stay that way. D:
Trying to suck less. Hopefully succeeding at that at least.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 05:26 pm (UTC)YOU'RE AMAZING <3
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 06:47 pm (UTC)Also: Icon. Freaking hilarious.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 08:25 pm (UTC)OMG finals indeed... I am obsessively rereading Watchfic instead of revising.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 08:42 pm (UTC)Mine start next week, as well. I've been reading Rosemary Sutcliff novels and diligently copying Joe Kubert brushwork for practice. Also, it must be said, Watchmen fandom is ridiculously full of inspiring writers and artists. My fanbrain is constantly switched on, as a result.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 08:50 pm (UTC)Heh my finals are mostly going to involve memorizing cell signaling mechanics and physics equations and maclaurin expansions. D: D: So. NOT IN A GREAT MOOD at least as far as school goes, though of course, the internets are always here to pick me up. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-06 01:22 am (UTC)I really like your pics, they kind of remind me of JKR's scratchy illustrations for HP.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-06 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-06 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-06 08:56 pm (UTC)And what you call meticulousness I would probably call mild OCD but heh whatever works. XD MUST REPOST ENTIRE STORY BECAUSE I NEED TO ADD A COMMA ON PAGE 27. AND THEN REMOVE IT AGAIN TEN MINUTES LATER.
also, web development
Date: 2009-05-06 09:13 pm (UTC)It's not out of the question that I'd draw something (for Watchmen OBVIOUSLY), just got other things going atm
Re: also, web development
Date: 2009-05-06 10:31 pm (UTC)Along those lines, I actually keep meaning to ask: does the fandom have an actual rec comm? Ie, not a place to post/index all fics but a place where people recommend fics they've liked (not their own obviously) so that people can be pointed to things that are high quality without having to navigate the labyrinthine network of fic sites, private LJs, comms, boards, etc on their own, reading everything until they find things that are good? XD I ask because another fandom I'm involved in(though not as much lately because WM has been eating my brain) has one and it's great to pop over to when you feel like reading something good and don't feel like engaging in an archeological dig to find it. If one exists, I need to find it. D:
Re: also, web development
Date: 2009-05-06 10:45 pm (UTC)Re: also, web development
Date: 2009-05-06 10:57 pm (UTC)Re: also, web development
Date: 2009-05-06 11:08 pm (UTC)Here's how it will be challenging:
- Who gets to post recs? Everyone? What if a stupid person wants to post a stupid rec (not kidding, not everyone agrees on the quality of art right?)
- How strict will you be about the format of the recs? Are posts like "lol i lieked this" ok?
- How will you ensure the comm is actually populated by enough recs to capture the best of the fandom? Maybe everyone's too busy/lazy/distracted to write up recs for all their favourites (I would try to do my own memories, though!)
"who the hell are you" isn't a problem at all (has nothing to do with the above point), I promise. Not only because what you know and what you can do are so much more important, but also because I'm sure I'm not the only one who considers you a big name author. So "who the hell" is not only an irrelevant question, but it's one you'd have a satisfactory answer to even if it were relevant ;)
Re: also, web development
Date: 2009-05-06 11:20 pm (UTC)I would say probably just have it be moderated, and as long as the fic being recced meets some basic standards of grammar and quality it goes through buuuuut moderation gets hairy sometimes. Some comms like this have an application to become a reccer and those selected people can post whatever they like. I'm not sure which would be the best way to do it.
It would be more of a realtime thing I think; ie, the intent isn't to fill it archivally immediately but have recs coming in at a regular rate so that people can always pull it up to find something new to read. So rather than dump ten in at once, people would ideally post stuff as they find it, after the initial bit where we all cram stuff in heh. I think the other site has an actual schedule where their selected people post a set number of recs per day or whatever but they're also working with a *trememdous* centralized archive and I don't think it needs to be/could be that formal in this case.
It seems worth a shot, though.
go for it ;)
Date: 2009-05-06 11:41 pm (UTC)I like "basic standards of grammar and quality" in a poster's reason for reccing as the determiner for whether or not a post is approved. Reccer applications could be very good and fruitful too, but also could be much more of a headache. Turning people down isn't easy, right? And then the alternative is just to be nice and let everyone in, in which case the whole process is meaningless.
Re: go for it ;)
Date: 2009-05-07 02:54 am (UTC)Now I just have to figure out what to call it. And possibly
begbribeconvince someone to help with the look because I'm completely useless with that sort of thing.Names, names, names...
Re: go for it ;)
Date: 2009-05-07 03:16 am (UTC)You know I'll do the layout for you as soon as I can get my own ridiculous project sorted (weeks, not months, I hope). Just pick one of the defaults that's functional to start out with.
btw, does your layout appear a wretched hospital green to you? I was talking to you from work earlier today and my monitor/gfx card/everything there is kind of ghetto...looked horrid, not cool.
Re: go for it ;)
Date: 2009-05-07 03:38 am (UTC)The layout has a *super* faint, desaturated greenish tinge to it, but I mean... really really faint. Certainly not 'hospital green'. It was probably just the gpu or possibly a monitor calibration issue. And I was not trying to snag you into doing the layout haha, just thinking out loud mostly. If you want to that'd be awesome, but no pressure.
Anyway it won't be able to happen until after finals anyway. After that I'll be home for the summer so plenty of time to get it off the ground and approve posts. :D I'm excited though!